New York Against Devocalization
  • Home
  • About Devocalization
  • Pending New York Devocalization Ban
    • Endorsers
  • Act Now to Ban Devocalization in NY
    • Action Alert: May 11-18
    • Action Alert: Don't Let Them Devocalize YOU!
    • Action Alert: Next Step, Call Ag MEMBERS Now
  • True Stories
    • Devocalized: Stella's Story
    • Devocalized: Lady's Story
    • Devocalized: Porter's Story
  • Expert Perspectives
  • Talk to Your Vet
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Disclaimer

Expert Perspectives on Devocalization

Here is what animal shelters and rescue organizations, concerned veterinarians, animal behavior experts and pet owners say about why they endorse legislation banning devocalization--even when performed by a veterinarian.

I had an 18-month-old Labrador Retriever patient that was devocalized and sold without disclosure to an unsuspecting pet owner. He had breathing difficulties, tired quickly when he tried to play, and coughed and gagged every time he ate and drank. Sometimes the coughing would persist for days. Significant scar tissue in his throat, a result of devocalization, was the cause of these problems. Referral to a veterinary surgeon was not an option for his owners due to cost. We eventually had to euthanize this poor guy. No animal should suffer like that.
John Green, DVM, Rensselaer

I strongly oppose devocalization.  Even when performed correctly, it commonly results in a condition in which the airway becomes obstructed by scar tissue. This is not only uncomfortable but can become life-threatening.  Attempts at surgical correction are fraught with failure. Another potential complication is inability of the larynx to prevent food and water from entering the trachea and lungs.  This practice should be considered an act of cruelty.
Joel M. Woolfson, DVM
Diplomate, American College of Veterinary Surgeons

Devocalization is a deplorable act of animal cruelty that also puts our communities at risk. Animals use different sounds to communicate different messages. Because devocalization eliminates or reduces vocal distinctions, people may not know when a dog or cat is angry, frustrated or afraid, and about to attack. Few can accurately read an animal’s body language, especially when the animal is not their own. Imagine kids racing up to pet a (devocalized) dog in the park, unaware his strange sounds mean, “Stay away or I’ll bite.” Even a small dog can do big damage to a child or frail senior.
Kelly McCartney, Director of Animal Control, City of Buffalo

Barking is the tip of a large and deep behavioral iceberg. Devocalize a bored, lonely or distressed dog, the most common reasons for so-called “nuisance” barking, and you’re begging him to express his distress through other inappropriate behaviors—such as biting.
Pat Miller, CPDT-KA, CBCC-KA
Past President, Association of Pet Dog Trainers
Board of Directors, Certification Council for Professional Dog Trainers

Picture
Anyone who says devocalization is not happening in New York is naïve or lying. I have had devocalized dogs relinquished to my rescue organization. One had been used as a breeding dog. Why was she given to us? Because she had cataracts and was no longer profitable. Why was she devocalized? For the breeder’s convenience. Devocalization is cruel and unusual punishment levied on animals for their owner’s bad behavior.
Joan Morrett, Director, CockerPalsRescue, Hobart
Photo Courtesy of CockerPalsRescue



As a practicing veterinarian, I am aware of the unethical nature of devocalization, unequivocally an act of cruelty. We should prevent dog and cat owners from subjecting animals to this surgery, including breeders and exhibitors. The Massachusetts legislature voted resoundingly to prohibit devocalization. NYSHA hopes New York will join its ranks and support the growing mandate to treat companion animals humanely.
Holly Cheever, DVM, Vice President, New York State Humane Association

Picture
Some people overlook or even reward "nuisance" behavior when their dogs are adorable puppies; they later realize that barking or nipping isn't so cute when their dogs mature. Devocalization is not the solution any more than cutting off a dog’s paws for jumping on guests would be.
Wilma Louras, Director, Wilma’s Orphans,
Hempstead
Photo Courtesy of Wilma's Orphans


As an elected official for 13 years, I have reviewed many pieces of legislation which support the safety and welfare of animals. I believe passage of A3431-A would benefit the majority of New Yorkers and all the animals under their care. Many shelter directors agree that passage of this bill would not cause a spike in surrenders to shelters. That concern should be addressed through increased support for spay/neuter efforts, not used as an excuse to derail A3431-A.
Brian Shapiro, Ulster County Legislator, District 2 (Ret.)
Executive Director, Ulster County SPCA,
Kingston

When I was working as a taxi driver I met a woman with many cats; she let me keep one. I started noticing he would try to meow but nothing would come out. My vet told me he had been devocalized. My cat will bob his head back and forth trying to make noise, but he just can’t. Sometimes it looks like he’s having a seizure. He gets his frustration out by acting up and often scratches me. If he was with another owner he would have been surrendered by now.
Michael Moisson

There is always a reason for persistent vocalization that should be understood and addressed. Surgery is not the answer and furthermore, it is inhumane. Whether vocal cord tissue is removed totally or partially (snipped, punched or notched), through an incision in the neck or via the oral cavity, surgery anywhere around the larynx subjects the patient to serious risks and pain. Many times, devocalized animals have to be re-operated on as a result of tissue regrowth, re-exposing them to risks and pain.
Nicholas Dodman, DVA, Diplomate, American College of Veterinary Behaviorists,
American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists

Picture
I have heard devocalized dogs at Westminster and other dog shows. Their attempts to bark were a horrible sound; the potential health consequences are even worse. Devocalized animals may choke on food, a truly terrifying way to die, suffer heat stroke or succumb to aspiration pneumonia. Many cough and gag persistently and have difficulty breathing. Those who advocate for access to devocalization may say the proposed law encroaches on their rights. However, in a civilized society, one’s rights stop short of causing another pain and suffering.
Ina Obernesser, DVM, New York City
Photo Courtesy of Uptown Veterinary Associates


Over the past 40 years, I’ve trained more than 44,000 dogs of all breeds, ages and temperaments, including those characterized by their owners as “nuisance” barkers. With consistent training, every one of them learned when to be quiet. There is no such thing as an untrainable dog. There are, however, irresponsible dog owners. Training requires Patience, Perseverance and Perspiration. Some people don’t want to invest that effort. Others consider their breeding or show dogs mere money-makers, using devocalization as an easy substitute for responsible care and training.That is inhumane and counterproductive. Surgically altering a dog’s voice doesn’t fix the reason it is barking or teach the dog to obey its owner. An owner who is not in control of his animals presents a risk to the public.
Anthony Jerone, Master Dog Trainer, Whitestone

Picture
Our shelter has had dogs surrendered to us after they were devocalized. All had multiple complications, physical and behavioral. A Cavalier King Charles was left with constant gagging. A cocker spaniel exhibited breathing difficulties. A third dog was surrendered because the family obtained another dog after devocalizing her and they did not get along. We adopted her out, but she was returned to us two weeks later for biting. It's not surprising. Cutting vocal cords doesn't address a dog’s needs. Instead, by allowing the owner to ignore them, it ensures the dog will act out in other ways, such as biting or house soiling.
Pamela Green, Executive Director, Kent Animal Shelter, Calverton
Photo Courtesy of Kent Animal Shelter


As the adopter of a now deceased devocalized dog, I can tell you firsthand that her voice was painful to hear. Without knowing my dog had been devocalized, I could not identify what was wrong with her. It was only later that I learned the wheezing was the result of cut vocal cords. It is unethical to put an animal through surgery for barking.
Massachusetts State Representative (Ret.) Willie Mae Allen

Devocalization is an act of animal cruelty and should never be used to deal with behavior. Without the voice that animals have been given, in instances where they or their families are in danger or distress, they cannot be heard.
Suzy Barron, Animal Control Officer, Warwick and Chester


Surgery to mask a dog or cat’s voice serves no purpose but convenience. The primary reasons animals are surrendered to us are divorce, moving, allergies, financial concerns and the owner’s death, not barking or meowing. Even devocalized animals lose their homes.
Denise Adams, Animal Care Manager, Wanderers’ Rest Humane Association, Canastota

Devocalization is an unnecessary surgery that can cause injury to animals and does not address the reason why they may be vocalizing, such as lack of training, illness, fear, stress and loneliness. We support legislation to prohibit devocalization.
Humane Society of New York, New York City

I know of a dog who choked to death after being devocalized by a licensed veterinarian. No matter how you look at it, devocalization is cruel and inhumane.
Shirley Moore, Founder/Director, Save A Dog

I’ve heard devocalized dogs trying to communicate. It is very unpleasant, dishonest for anyone to portray this procedure as mere “bark softening.” Dogs and cats vocalize for a reason, which only becomes problematic when owners make it so. Even energetic dogs will bark less when owners provide the exercise and interaction they demand. Ignoring a pet’s needs encourages the barking that owners complain annoys them. One can hardly blame the animal for his owner’s failure, nor remedy it by performing surgery.
Nancy Crowley, DVM

Devocalization is inhumane and unnecessary.
Daniel Lauridia, DVM, New York City

Picture
I adopted a devocalized Chihauhau from a Long Island rescue organization. Cutting her vocal cords didn't keep her from becoming homeless! My dog's voice is very disturbing; people always want to know what's wrong with her. I can't imagine what kind of person would have this done to a dog or cat. Please put an end to this cruelty in New York!
Karen Mahmud

Research has proven that the way we treat vulnerable animals transfers to the way we treat humans. Allowing the surgical stifling of our "best friends" has a chilling effect on empathy, compassion and tolerance. It is a terrible lesson to teach our children.
Juliet Sternberg, LMSW, Brooklyn

Devocalization serves no purpose but the convenience of the owner or breeder at substantial risk to the animal.
Thomas Scheibel, DVM, Brookhaven

Devocalization is cruel even when performed by a veterinarian. There are inherent surgical risks any time an animal's anatomy is altered. While some surgical procedures, such as spay/neuter, benefit the animal, devocalization is inhumane and unethical. It should be banned.
Leilani Alvarez, DVM, Bedford Hills

Picture
I would not consider sheltering a group of dogs if I had neighbors close by. That would be irresponsible. Nor would I have dogs at all if could not tolerate or humanely manage their barking. Obviously, some people do not behave responsibly. Why should the animal be punished with cut vocal cords as a consequence? Dogs bark just as humans talk. Deal with it humanely or don’t have a pet dog and don’t breed them.
 
Christine Mann, Founder, Hudson Valley Rottweiler Rescue, Cuddebackville
Photo Courtesy of Hudson Valley Rottweiler Rescue

Barking doesn’t hurt seniors, but biting does. The dog who can’t bark a warning he’s
about to bite is a danger to his owner and other senior housing residents. Seniors may not be able to hear or understand the muffled, indistinguishable sounds a devocalized dog makes. And do not expect those with reduced vision or impaired cognition to interpret the dog’s body language.
Andrea Ellen Keigan, Senior Housing Management Consultant

Devocalization is barbaric.
Margaret Ohlinger, DVM, Burdett

I will never forget my patient, a Bichon-Frise, who had been devocalized as a puppy. Devocalization didn’t change the high-strung personality common in this breed. Scar tissue that developed following the surgery, performed by a highly competent, Board-certified surgeon, made anesthetic procedures later in this dog’s life much more difficult.
Ann Thompson, DVM

The Southampton Animal Shelter Foundation opposes devocalization as a means to control barking. Instead, we encourage pet owners to seek professional assistance with behavior issues.
Ed Fritz, Executive Director, Southampton Animal Shelter Foundation, Hampton Bays

Picture
I have met dogs in New York who had been devocalized
and still given up to a rescue organization. The procedure does not stop the act of barking, but what comes out is a horrible, strained and harsh sound. As a professional dog trainer and an urban pet owner, I find this to be cruel and shortsighted. There are many reasons dogs bark and cats meow; I want to know why a particular animal is behaving in a problematic way and work to find a humane solution. I know from experience that when the basic needs of training, exercise, mental stimulation and attention are met, so-called "nuisance" barking is not a problem. To turn to devocalization to keep animals quiet is shameful.
Viviane Arzoumanian, CPDT-KA, CBCC-KA, PMCT-2,
Certified Professional Dog Trainer,
Brooklyn
Photo Courtesy of PumpkinPups Dog Training

Barking and meowing are normal communication. They only become problematic when an owner ignores his or her animal’s need for companionship, exercise and mental stimulation; houses an innately “talkative” breed or keeps many animals where their collective vocalization will not be tolerated, whether by the owner or neighbors. Should animals suffer lifelong harm or premature death for an owner’s convenience or greed?
John G. Hynes, DVM, Staten Island

Devocalization happens more than people realize. I myself adopted a Chihauhua named Candy who was previously devocalized. All her meals had to be monitored for fear she would choke on her food.
John Perrault, Executive Director, Berkshire Humane Society

Regardless of the method by which it is performed, devocalization exposes the animal to infection, blood loss, the unintended inhalation of liquids and solid foods into the lungs, and the risks of anesthesia. It can trigger scarred vocal cord tissue regrowth, which can lead to aspiration pneumonia, heatstroke and choking, and may necessitate additional corrective surgeries. Other long-term consequences can include chronic coughing and gagging and breathing difficulties. There are much more humane ways to deal with vocalization.
Barbara Hodges, DVM, MBA, Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association, a national
veterinary professional association

Picture
Devocalization does not keep animals out of shelters. Standard poodles were relinquished to us by a breeder after he had some devocalized so neighbors would not complain about his breeding business. Ironically, he was evicted from the property for other reasons. It is heartbreaking to hear a devocalized dog, both the mournful sound of the voice, and the knowledge that the animal has been subjected to a needless, invasive procedure. All surgery has risks; however, devocalization has no benefit for the patient. It is inhumane.
Joyce Garrity, Executive Director, Dutchess County SPCA, Hyde Park
Photo Courtesy of Dutchess County SPCA
                                            
I am a veterinarian who performs surgery regularly and fully endorse the legislation to prohibit devocalization. Potential complications include aspiration pneumonia, chronic coughing, tracheitis and nerve damage. Scarred vocal cord tissue re-growth may obstruct the airway resulting in potentially fatal compromised breathing and swallowing.
Eileen Jefferson, DVM, Woodstock

We adopted Lady from the humane society where she had been surrendered twice after being devocalized. Our home is her third. It is sad for us to hear the raspy, hoarse sounds she makes, interrupted by coughing and gagging.
Gene and Fran Nadeau

Picture
Devocalization can have serious consequences for the patient, both surgical risks and potential complications that may cause the animal lifelong suffering or even death. It is inhumane. Pet owners should investigate and resolve the underlying reason for excessive vocalization rather than exposing their animals to an invasive and possibly dangerous elective procedure. Breeders who are concerned about noise complaints should find another location for their business.
Eric Dougherty, DVM, New York City
Photo Courtesy of The Cat Practice

Debarking (devocalization) has been regarded by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons as mutilation for decades. It is an offence in the UK under the Animal Welfare Act.
Dogs Trust, London, England

Domestic animals look to us for humane leadership; it is one of the ways in which we build a bond with them for our mutual benefit. Cutting vocal cords to suppress the animal’s voice does not allow that bond to develop. Nor does it teach the animal to accept our leadership, putting the animal, ourselves and our neighbors at risk. It is easier to cut vocal cords than to provide appropriate care and training. It can be quite profitable to breed animals and convenient to do so wherever one chooses. And it may be instantly gratifying to bring home a cute but innately “noisy” dog or cat rather than select a breed more suitable for one’s environment and noise tolerance. That does not justify devocalization, an act of callousness and cruelty.
Social Workers Advancing the Human-Animal Bond, Brooklyn

Picture
I am a canine handler for the Central Intelligence Agency and have served duties in Afghanistan and Iraq. I cannot begin to tell you how many times a barking dog has changed a potentially dangerous situation for people just by sounding an alarm…which can be the difference between life and death. We teach the dogs when it’s “ok” to bark and when we need them to be quiet.
Dennis O., Federal Police Canine Handler, CIA

I have had the unfortunate experience of treating a devocalized dog. The dog presented with chronic inflammation, the result of having had vocal cord tissue cut to suppress his voice. He still would try to bark, but experienced pain with every attempt. When excited, he’d bark despite the pain, which in turn caused infections. Life post-devocalization was miserable for this dog. Surgically altering or removing a dog or cat’s voice for its own sake is an act of selfishness and irresponsibility. It is abjectly inhumane.
Alexander Klein, DVM, Brooklyn

Surgically muffling or removing a dog's or cat's voice is something we do for our own benefit, not the animal's. It is inhumane.
Alberto Gil, DVM, Dix Hills

Picture
Devocalization is an unnecessary evil that not only compromises the animal’s health, wellbeing and longevity, it compromises the animal-human bond as well. In more than 20 years of rescue, I’ve seen over and over that people cannot read dog and cat body language. When vocal cords are cut, nuanced sounds that express different needs and feelings, from “play with me” to “I’m scared and will bite you,” are removed. You can’t understand what your pet is trying to tell you, which is as frustrating for the animal as it is for you. Devocalization is an act of selfishness, ignorance and greed with absolutely no benefit for the animal. 
David Bernacchi, Founder/Director, Pets 4 Luv,
Islip Terrace
Photo Courtesy of Pets 4 Luv


We have seen the suffering devocalization causes firsthand. One of our clients came to us after adopting a devocalized Labrador; another, after purchasing a Pekingese and having her pet devocalized. Both individuals hoped to relieve their dogs’ chronic coughing. Unfortunately, there is no cure for persistent coughing caused by devocalization. In fact, it is quite a common complication of this unnecessary surgery, one of many that cause animals tremendous distress. Some complications can be fatal. Our two patients will suffer the rest of their lives for human convenience. Even removing scar tissue from the throat, a major and very expensive surgery, is in most cases just a temporary fix. The scar tissue typically re-forms, necessitating additional surgery.
Gilbert Cintron, DVM, and Carlos Cintron, DVM, Bay Shore

I am a third-generation dog trainer, and the founding director of a 128-acre, nonprofit sanctuary for dogs who would otherwise be euthanized. At any given time, we shelter 90-100 dogs. Some are relinquished by owners, others come from shelters that cannot adopt them out due to behavioral problems, primarily biting. No dog has been brought here for barking. Some breeds are known to bark more than others, some bay or howl. That should be considered before deciding to breed or bring a pet home. But all dogs who are lonely, afraid or need more exercise may communicate their distress by barking. It’s much better to resolve the distress than to have a dog that ends up abandoned or destroyed as even devocalized dogs are.
Alan Papszycki, Founding Director, Spirit Animal Sanctuary, Boonville

Well-considered selection and proper care, training and housing of animals are what prevent so-called “nuisance” behaviors. Cutting vocal cords is irresponsible. Irresponsible people are among the first to give up their animals or abandon them on the streets.
Julie Serenson, Vice President, Friends of the Yonkers Animal Shelter, Yonkers

Picture
To subject an animal to the risks of devocalization for the purpose of stifling its voice is cruel. There are many humane solutions for troublesome vocalization, from medication and homeopathic products that calm the nerves of anxious animals to providing companionship, exercise and play. People need to think before they bring a pet home or decide to breed. Dogs and cats don’t need to have their vocal cords cut to manage behavior. People need to be responsible: These are sentient beings with needs, not toys or trophies.
Jill Elliot, DVM, New York City
Photo Courtesy of NY/NJ Holistic Vet


Some breeds vocalize more than others. This must be part of the decision-making process before bringing a pet home or deciding to breed animals. Similarly, it is essential to consider whether one can provide an appropriate environment and care. A dog who is easily excitable is not the best choice for an apartment, where he will hear and respond to many external noises throughout the day and night. We prefer that “barky” dogs be surrendered to a humane organization than devocalized. We will find an adopter who will care for, train and house their pet responsibly, so normal behavior needn’t become a “problem.”
Gayle Fitzpatrick, Founder/President, Friends of the Plymouth Pound

Fritz, our Black Lab, was kept with a breeder until he was nine months, which is when his hip
x-ray came back as fair and not excellent. He wasn’t “perfect” enough to breed, so he was devocalized and then put in a cage outside and ignored. That’s when we came in and got him. Fritz sounds hoarse as if he’s smoked 50 cigarettes a day and he gags when he eats or drinks. Even water won’t go down comfortably.
Kate Sanders-Pedersen

Picture
While it is true that some breeds are barkier than others, it is the height of cruelty and irresponsibility to get one and then have it devocalized...or to breed animals, who obviously make more noise in groups, and devocalize rather than choosing a more appropriate place to operate a breeding enterprise. New York must not tolerate devocalization.
Toni Roman, Founder/Director, HEART Rescue Group,
New Hyde Park
Photo Courtesy of HEART Rescue Group


Some individuals do not consider an animal’s inherent traits before choosing to breed or bringing a pet home. Other people keep many dogs or cats near neighbors, which courts complaints. They shouldn’t compensate for poor judgment by having animals’ vocal cords cut.
Michael McCarthy, DVM, Voorheesville

Before relocating to the United States, I practiced veterinary medicine in Germany and my husband in Northern Ireland. Devocalization is outlawed in the UK and all countries that have signed the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals. Devocalization is mutilation. It is also unnecessary. I have a terrier, a notoriously “barky” breed, who knows when he must be quiet because I took the time to train him. I also provide the exercise and companionship he needs. Finally, the claim that devocalization keeps animals out of shelters is simply untrue. Several of my clients adopted homeless dogs who had been previously devocalized. They rescued these animals despite their odd, unpleasant, surgically altered voice, not because of it.
Tina Aiken, DVM, Ancramdale

Picture
I stand in opposition to devocalization, which has no benefit to the patient, but rather causes harm, from surgical pain to airway obstruction, pneumonia or even death. In addition, animals undergoing the procedure are allowed to live with severe separation anxiety or other disorders, which are simply hidden from sound.
Konstantine Barsky, DVM, Brooklyn

We adopted out three devocalized Standard Poodles. One had been tethered outside most of the day, and barked his loneliness. After having him devocalized, the owner gave him up. Two dogs were littermates whose owner had them devocalized and subsequently gave them up. The claim that surgically altering a dog’s voice will prevent abandonment is absurd.
Amanda Lion, Board Member, Poodle Rescue of New England

Devocalization is animal cruelty, not rescue. I encountered a devocalized dog who had been given up; it was among the worst sounds I have ever heard. That pales in comparison with the pain and risks to which this poor animal was subjected and will face his entire life for someone’s convenience or profit.
Debbie Romano, Co-Founder and President, SaveKitty Foundation, Bellerose

Picture
Barking and meowing are normal behaviors, not pathology to be addressed by removing healthy tissue. People who do not like the voices dogs and cats were born with shouldn’t own or breed them. Many claim they love their animals. Cutting vocal cords to suppress an animal’s voice is not love. It is abuse.
Lisa Donato, DVM, Albertson
Photo Courtesy of Dr. Lisa Donato


Cutting vocal cords to alter or remove a dog's or cat's voice for its own sake is patently cruel, irrespective of how the procedure is performed and by whom. I have known veterinarians who devocalize. As long as there are those who yield to the demands of their clients by performing this painful, risky surgery, we need legislation to protect dogs and cats.
Ted Weiner, DVM, New York City

Our mission is in our name: prevention of cruelty to animals. Devocalization is an act of cruelty, an unnecessary surgery that is not in the best interest of any animal.
John Faso, Executive Director, SPCA of Niagara, Niagara Falls

Picture
Devocalization is just a quick fix for lazy breeders or pet owners. "Barking" is not a reason dogs lose their homes; irresponsible owners are.
Kathy McLoughlin, Founder/Director, Tiny Treasures Rescue, Yonkers
Photo Courtesy of Tiny Treasures Rescue

Devocalization offers the patient no advantage, only risks, some of which may be life-threatening. I have treated devocalized dogs and can attest the voice they are left with is painful to hear.
Michael Ferrigno, VMD, Bellport

Animals who vocalize incessantly are likely to do so because they are suffering frustration, loneliness or excitement. For “talkative” breeds, New England Federation of Humane Societies recommends placement into environments where vocalization is accepted.
Leslie Harris, New England Federation of Humane Societies

A dog was relinquished to me for what the owner said was incessant barking. It turns out she
left her dog alone nearly the entire day. Of course he barked! He was calling out for the companionship, exercise and play animals require. In my care, he barks appropriately. A Yorkshire terrier was relinquished to me, whose barking was labeled “bad behavior” but was actually caused by a neurological problem. With treatment, both the medical issue and barking have been resolved. A former employee had her show dogs devocalized. Their voices were far more annoying that the bark nature gave them, scratchy like laryngitis. But unlike laryngitis, devocalization is forever.
Tracy Muscatello, Owner, HeartsHerd Animal Sanctuary, Buskirk






Copyright 2012, Coalition to Protect and Rescue Pets. All Rights Reserved.

Create a free website with Weebly Photo used under Creative Commons from Beverly & Pack